How We Review Bookmakers
We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Most betting review sites won’t show you their scoring formula. We will.
Every ABT operator review is scored across seven weighted categories, from Sports & Markets (20%) to Licensing & Trust (5%), using real deposits, real withdrawals, and real support tickets. We test every operator ourselves, verify licences directly with regulators, and update scores when terms change. Here’s exactly how it works.
How We Score Bookmakers
We score every operator across seven categories, each weighted by how much it actually matters to African punters. Sports & Markets and Payments & Withdrawals each carry 20% because they’re the core product and the number-one source of complaints. Odds Quality, Bonuses, and Mobile Experience sit at 15% each. Customer Support takes 10%. Licensing & Trust gets 5%.
Each category is scored out of 5. The weighted total produces an overall score rounded to one decimal place. That’s the number you see at the top of every review.
| Category | Weight | What We’re Looking At |
|---|---|---|
| Sports & Markets | 20% | Sports covered, football market depth, local league coverage (NPFL, KPL, PSL), live betting, virtuals |
| Payments & Withdrawals | 20% | Deposit/withdrawal methods, speeds, fees, mobile money integration, withdrawal tax handling |
| Odds Quality | 15% | Payout percentages, margin vs competitors on the same match, accumulator boosts |
| Bonuses & Promotions | 15% | Welcome offer terms, wagering requirements, ongoing promos, honest value assessment |
| Mobile Experience | 15% | App availability (APK, Play Store, iOS), data usage, zero-data features, UX quality |
| Customer Support | 10% | Channels (live chat, email, WhatsApp), response times, operating hours |
| Licensing & Trust | 5% | Licence holder, issuing body, verification against current register, responsible gambling tools |
Why the Weights Are Different in Africa
Global review sites typically weight payments at 10-15% and mobile at 5-10%. Ours are higher because the African betting market is a different animal. Withdrawal reliability is the number-one complaint among African bettors, and more than 70% of all betting activity on the continent happens on a phone.
That 70% figure isn’t a guess. In South Africa, 81% of bets are placed on mobile devices. When your entire user base lives on a phone, a bad app isn’t a minor inconvenience. It’s a dealbreaker.
Payments & Withdrawals carries 20% of the overall score, equal to Sports & Markets, because when your money is stuck in limbo after a withdrawal request, nothing else about the operator matters. We don’t just check whether an operator lists OPay or M-Pesa as a payment method. The test is whether the integration actually works, how fast withdrawals land, and what fees get taken along the way. Withdrawal taxes matter too: Kenya’s 20% withholding tax on winnings, Nigeria’s 5% federal withholding tax, and South Africa where recreational gambling winnings are generally untaxed.
Sports & Markets at 20% includes something most global frameworks skip entirely: local league coverage. If an operator claims to cover African football but offers three markets on NPFL matches while serving 200+ on the Premier League, that shows up in the score.
What We Actually Test
Every operator we review gets a real deposit, at least one real withdrawal, a support ticket, and app testing on both Android and iOS. Odds get compared on the same fixture across operators, and mobile money integration is tested first-hand. You can’t rate a site you haven’t used.
Here’s what a typical review involves:
Deposits and withdrawals. The deposit goes in using the local currency: Naira, KES, or ZAR. Then comes the withdrawal. How long does it take from request to receipt? What fees appear? Do the stated processing times match reality?
App testing. The Android APK (both direct download and Play Store versions where available), the iOS app, and the mobile web experience all get a run. Navigation, bet placement speed, live betting performance, and data usage are the key markers.
Odds comparison. Odds on the same fixture from 2-3 operators, compared across multiple fixtures. Not a one-off check. The numbers feed directly into the Odds Quality score.
Support testing. A real support ticket goes in and the response gets timed. Live chat gets tested for whether it connects to a human. WhatsApp support (if offered) gets checked for whether it actually responds or sits on read.
Local league check. How many markets does the operator offer on NPFL, KPL, and PSL matches versus European leagues? Thin local coverage is a mark against the Sports & Markets score.
How We Verify Licensing
The actual regulator’s register gets checked for every operator we review. That means knowing which regulator to check. Since the Nigerian Supreme Court struck down the NLRC in November 2024, most other review sites still reference a licensing body that no longer exists.
Here’s what gets verified for each market:
Nigeria: The NLRC lost its regulatory authority in November 2024 when the Supreme Court declared the National Lottery Act unconstitutional. Since May 2025, Nigerian operators are licensed through the FSGRN Universal Reciprocity Certificate, a unified framework covering 25 participating states. Verification goes against the FSGRN URC register plus state-level licences, particularly from the Lagos State Lotteries and Gaming Authority (LSLGA), the most active state regulator.
Kenya: The Betting Control and Licensing Board (BCLB) is transitioning to the new Gambling Regulatory Authority under the Gambling Control Act 2023. Operators are verified against the current register, and the transition timeline is monitored. The handover was expected by end of February 2026.
South Africa: The National Gambling Board sets standards, but actual licences come from nine Provincial Licensing Authorities. The check confirms the operator holds a valid Bookmaker (Betting) Licence from the relevant PLA, not just that they claim to be “licensed in South Africa.”
If an operator can’t be verified against the current register for their market, Licensing & Trust gets marked accordingly.
What Keeps Reviews Honest
ABT earns affiliate commissions when readers sign up through our links. That’s how the site is funded. You should know that upfront.
But the scoring formula is published above. You can see exactly how every rating is calculated, and commissions don’t move the numbers. An operator paying higher commissions doesn’t get a higher score. The weights are fixed, the categories are defined, and the evidence behind each score is in the review.
ABT’s eight-rule fact-checking protocol requires every claim to be verified from a primary source before publication. Operator data comes from current terms and conditions, not marketing pages. Regulatory claims come from the regulator’s own site, not from the operator’s “About Us” page.
Every review carries one name: David Okonkwo’s. Not “our team of experts.” Not “the editorial staff.” One person, accountable for every score. You can read more about who runs AfricaBetTips and the editorial principles behind the site.
When Scores Change
Reviews aren’t one-and-done. Every reviewed operator gets revisited when something material changes: bonus terms, withdrawal speeds, payment methods, licensing status, or a regulatory action. Google’s Quality Rater Guidelines explicitly flag stale gambling content as a quality problem. So do we.
Here’s what triggers a score update:
+ Bonus changes: new welcome offer, changed wagering requirements, promo code updates
+ Payment changes: new deposit/withdrawal methods added or removed, fee changes, speed changes
+ Licensing changes: new licence, licence suspension or revocation, regulatory action
+ App updates: major redesign, new features, performance changes
+ Regulatory shifts: changes like the NLRC dissolution that affect how an operator’s compliance is assessed
When a score changes, the review gets updated with the new data and the date of the last update. No quiet number adjustments.
Who Writes ABT Reviews
Every ABT review is written by David Okonkwo, a named, accountable author whose credentials you can verify. Not an anonymous “team of experts.” David is the sole reviewer. His name is on every review because he stands behind every score.
David’s been covering African football and sports betting for over a decade, tracking markets across Nigeria, Kenya, South Africa, and East Africa. He takes a numbers-first approach to evaluating bookmakers: breaking down odds, testing payment systems, and finding where operators deliver real value versus where they fall short.
You can read David’s full credentials on the author page.
Want to see this review process in practice? Every operator review on the site follows the framework you’ve just read.
If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, visit our responsible gambling page for free support resources.